In addition, the bass port has moved from the rear to the front, allowing greater placement flexibility. A new convex dust cap is also fitted, which should offer a smoother roll-off at the top end and, thus, lower distortion. On the mid/bass driver front, the new unit is the same size and basic material, but the Aramid weave is different and the rear of the cone is coated with damping material. It’s under the skin where things have changed a bit more than first appearances suggest. Even a glance at the spec shows the driver lineup to be ostensibly as before, with an aramid fibre bass/midrange driver crossing over to a 25mm cloth dome tweeter. Stylistically, there has been a small amount of change to the front baffle and the newbies are fractionally narrower and taller, but the family resemblance is clear. In the case of the standmounts, floorstanders and centres, the smaller models use 133mm main drive units (hence the B5.2, C5.2 and F5.2 monikers), but the larger B/C/F6.2 models make use of 165mm units in larger cabinets for greater presence and better bass extension. In addition, two more subwoofers are recommended as perfect partners for the 2.0 models, should your walls require a little more shaking than the £259 Debut 2.0 S10.2 can provide. In the case of the Debut 2.0, this means nine models – two standmounters, two floorstanders, two centre channels, one on-wall surround speaker pair, one pair of Dolby Atmos speakers and one subwoofer. Following an illustrious career encompassing the likes of KEF, Infinity and TAD, Jones joined ELAC in 2015, breathing new life into the brand and creating well-defined ranges. As a result, barely two years after the game-changing Debut range arrived, we now see the Debut 2.0, which includes the £299 B6.2 standmount before you here.Īs with the original range, the man behind the new models is designer Andrew Jones. Fortunately, as its press release points out: “ELAC can’t leave well alone”. KEF Q150 vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.As Andrew Jones returns to sprinkle magic dust on ELAC’s Debut range, HFC checks out the 2.0 standmount makeoverĪs a market, the budget loudspeaker sector is a hectic one at the best of times and most companies realise that to sit back on their laurels after a successful product launch is a bad move. KEF Q150 is 15mm narrower and 72mm shorter than ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 but it is also 10mm deeper.īelow you can see the front view size comparison of KEF Q150 and ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 in scale.Ĭomparison image of KEF Q150 and ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 Size and External Dimensions In this section, we are going to compare KEF Q150's and ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2's external dimensions. Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2's front-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to KEF Q150 with its rear-firing port. Q150 has a rear firing port whereas Debut 2.0 B6.2 has a front firing ports. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.ĮLAC Debut 2.0 B6.2's 5-Way post terminals Q150 features 5-Way post type posts and Debut 2.0 B6.2 has a 5-Way post type posts. Such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speakerĬompared to a lower max handling speaker. Q150 can handle a max power of 120 watts RMS from the amp the whereas Q150 has a max power handling value of 100 watts RMS, 20 watts less than the Debut 2.0 B6.2. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance, inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker. Range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |